On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Adam Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This problem exists today with postMessage() too. Do people think we > > should go fully asynchronous? > > I had assumed it was asynchronous (and I think others might make the > same assumption) because the PostMessage API in Windows is > asynchronous. The synchronous version in the Windows API is called > SendMessage.
I assumed it was asynchronous too. - a
