Dnia 26-03-2008, Śr o godzinie 12:42 -0500, Tab Atkins Jr. pisze: > > I'm coming around to the opinion that <dl>, <ul>, and <ol> (and the > new list elements in html5) should allow a larger set of elements as > their direct children. I've been playing around with <hn> within <ul> > or <ol> (with the intended semantics being that it's a header *for the > list*), as it provides a nice tight binding that makes it easier to > style and move around with CSS. I could also use <section> or <div>, > of course, but my solution communicates exactly the semantics I want > and nothing else.
OTOH it breaks the context-free structure of the DTD: INS can have LI only if within a list. I am not sure it is DTD-able. (Yes, it would make a counterargument to my own wish :-b) Chris
