On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indeed. (This isn't unique to this proposal; the original idea of an API > would be even more vulnerable to this, since scripts could just invoke it > at any time they please.) > Of course, but that can be seen as an advantage since it's obvious to everyone that confirmation UI is needed. Rob -- "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6]
