Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Apr 14, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Patrick Mueller wrote:
This seems slightly different because it's making a dependency on
(unspec'd) JavaScript behavior. Though I'd guess there are other
examples.
FWIW I believe the next version of the ECMAScript spec will specify the
order of for..in enumeration.
And that's another way to resolve the issue! :-)
Checking some EcmaScript spec pages, like this one:
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=es3.1:es3.1_proposal_working_draft
it appears that current versions of the spec have basically removed the
description that the properties are unordered, without specifying that
they're ordered, or how their ordered. But a step in the 'right'
direction, I suppose.
--
Patrick Mueller
