On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Peter Kasting <pkast...@google.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:34 PM, King InuYasha <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Mainly because ffmpeg has way more than H.264 and other MPEG4 profile >> codecs. FFmpeg has a lot more than MPEG4 and MPEG2 and having licenses just >> for those might not be enough. >> > > Why are you assuming that the FFMPEG binaries with Google Chrome are > compiled with support for all possible codecs that the FFMPEG sources can be > compiled to support? > > PK > Because until about 10 minutes ago, I was unaware that FFmpeg could be compiled to strip out codecs that you don't want.
