Drew Wilson wrote: > > SharedWorkers are overloaded to provide a way for > pages under the same domain to share state, but > this seems like an orthogonal goal to "parallel > execution" and I suspect that we may have ended > up with a cleaner solution had we decided to > address the "shared state" issue via a separate > mechanism. > > [...] > > 3) Sharing between pages requires going through > the database or shared worker - you can't just > party on a big shared datastructure.
Assuming this shared state doesn't require a full JavaScript global context, and could do with some root object or collection, would it be possible to extend Web Storage to support this task? Best regards Mike Wilson
