On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Erik Vorhes<e...@textivism.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Smylers<smyl...@stripey.com> wrote: >> >> As Ian has pointed out, the above is technically non-conforming with >> what the HTML 4 spec claims. But it's how I've been using <cite> for >> years, since it makes sense and has a use. > > > I defy you to show me in the HTML 4.01 specification where something > like the following is nonconforming: > > <p>I like to read nonfiction, such as <cite>John Adams</cite>, but I > had more time for that when I was a professional academic.</p> > > Erik >
I don't think John Adams is a name of a person in this context. It is a group of works. Remco