Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Ian Hickson<i...@hixie.ch> wrote: > > Upon further consideration I've renamed getStorageUpdates() to > > yieldForStorageUpdates(). > > I really liked Darin's (?) suggestion of allowStorageUpdates as that > seems to exactly describe the intended use of the function. We no > longer prevent other page from updating the storage.
Quite nice. One little nit is that it could be interpreted as allowing oneself's updates, while it is really about allowing other's updates. allowOtherStorageUpdates? (not so nice, but... ;-) Is there a preference for having the name indicate that "we" are finishing our own transaction, ie myStorageUpdatesAreNowComplete endStorageUpdates finishStorageUpdates commitStorageUpdates flushStorageUpdates saveStorageUpdates or should it indicate that "others" are now welcome to do their stuff, such as in: otherPagesStorageUpdatesAreNowWelcome allow(Other)StorageUpdates enable(Other)StorageUpdates ? Best regards Mike