In the section for the time element, the spec states:
"This element is intended as a way to encode modern dates and times in
a machine-readable way so that user agents can offer to add them to
the user's calendar."
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-time-element
It seems very, very restrictive to dictate one single use case for an
element. Specifying an example use case, I could understand, but a
single use case? Isn't that kind of like dictating a single use for an
API before it has even been released?
Elsewhere in the spec, this usage is contravened. In the section on
"common idioms without dedicated elements", this example is given:
"The following extract shows how an IM conversation log could be
marked up.
<p> <time>14:22</time> <b>egof</b> I'm not that nerdy, I've only seen
30% of the star trek episodes"
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/commands.html#conversations
I think that's a perfectly reasonable use of the time element* but I
find it hard to imagine how a user could add a chat message to their
calendar.
Jeremy
--
Jeremy Keith
a d a c t i o
http://adactio.com/
* The example is, however, a terrible use of the b element. The cite
element is more appropriate.
