Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:28 AM, Lachlan Hunt<lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au>  wrote:
To some extent, it even makes it difficult for authors to provide reasonable
styles if they can't guarantee which elements content writers will choose
for their caption.  Imagine designing a CMS template with some default
styles for figure and caption, the CSS in the template would have to deal
with so many possible element choices just for the caption, it'll be
difficult to get it right and test everything.

There are a multitude of "reset" style sheets on the web today that
don't seem to have a problem removing virtually all default styling
from elements.  It would not be difficult to modify one to strip a
@caption element down to bare bones and then restyle as desired.

Applying reset styles alone and making all elements look the same basically defeats the purpose of being able to use a range of different elements, and is very likely not what an author would ultimately want.

Reset styles are just used to give different elements a more level playing field for new styles, and so authors would then still have to go through all the elements and style them appropriately for use as a caption. Plus, authors have to worry about cascading issues from other styles in their own stylesheets.

Say, for instance, an author had applied special styles to paragraphs in some special type of section:

#foo p { margin-left: 1em; }

And then a content writer puts a figure in there using <p caption>, but the CSS author failed to adequately account for figures being used in that section, despite doing:

p[caption] { margin: 0; }

Due to specificity, the first rule would apply regardless and the caption would get a potentially unwanted margin.

I know there are ways to work around the issue, such as using !important or finding ways to increase the specificity of the latter selector, but the point is that introducing unnecessary element clashes creates needless complexities that should be avoided.

--
Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software
http://lachy.id.au/
http://www.opera.com/

Reply via email to