On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch> wrote:
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (榈~\椋兼~V~G鎫U~O) wrote:
protocol now accepts U+0020. Is it ok to use U+0020 only in /protocol/ ? (e.g. new WebSocket("ws://example.com/", " "); ) It seems space is optional after colon in field of handshake message, how can we distinguish U+0020 and U+0020 U+0020 ?
The space isn't optional (both the client and the server are required to send it before the subprotocol name), it's just that the client will handle a missing space gracefully. Maybe we should remove that "feature", and require that the space be present, closing the connection otherwise? I don't feel strongly either way.
Anyway, the point is that "WebSocket-Protocol: " is the empty string, and "WebSocket-Protocol: " is a one-space protocol name.
Hi, Ian, let me confirm one thing: Empty string is not allowed for subprotocol, is it? Yuzo
-- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' _______________________________________________ hybi mailing list h...@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi
