On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:32:51 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote:
On 8/4/10 4:29 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
That could be, but is this behavior actually useful for anything? It's
certainly simpler to implement and more predictable for authors to
always wait until the current script has finished executing.
1) That requires defining "current script".
OK, but that's just a spec problem. It's trivial in implementation because
when the resource selection algorithm was is triggered by a script, you
can just pass along a reference to that very script.
2) Who said it will ever finish executing?
If it doesn't, just don't ever continue with the synchronous section. Is
there any valid case for a script never finishing? It would block all
event handlers from running too, so in any case it's a broken page.
--
Philip Jägenstedt
Core Developer
Opera Software
