On Aug 16, 2010, at 2:49 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:23:55 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <m...@apple.com> wrote: >> We do consider this, but since the status quo is "every browser but Firefox >> implements it", it's not clear that flipping WebKit-based browsers from one >> column to the other is a genuine interoperability improvement. Nor does it >> seem clear that changing all other browsers to match the odd man out is even >> the best overall strategy to getting there. > > We would need to get a very solid definition for it though as it is not at > all implemented in the same way.
I agree that to achieve full interop it would require a proper spec. > > http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/ > > <!DOCTYPE html>...<span style=display:block>test</span><script> > w(encodeURI(document.body.innerText)) </script> > > Opera does not use a newline for <span> set to display:block and includes > (contrary to e.g. Chrome) the contents of the <script> element. > > If this can somehow share a lot of code with copy and paste -- as you > indicate -- that does make it more interesting to keep, in my opinion. > > > (What is up with Safari and the w() function on Live DOM Viewer by the way? > It very rarely works for me. Do I need to run nightlies?) Worked for me in both Safari 5.0.1 and a recent nightly when I tried it. Regards, Maciej