On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:09:13 +0200, Jian Li <jia...@chromium.org> wrote:
Several specs, like File API and WebGL, use ArrayBuffer, while other
spec, like XMLHttpRequest Level 2, use ByteArray. Should we change to
use the same name all across our specs? Since we define ArrayBuffer in
the Typed Arrays spec (
https://cvs.khronos.org/svn/repos/registry/trunk/public/webgl/doc/spec/TypedArray-spec.html),
should we favor ArrayBuffer?
In addition, can we consider adding ArrayBuffer support to BlobBuilder,
FormData, and XMLHttpRequest.send()?
So TC39 is going to leave this thing alone? I.e. are we sure ArrayBuffer
is the way of the future?
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
