On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Robert O'Callahan <rob...@ocallahan.org> > wrote: > > In the absence of compelling use cases, I'd just leave it at <img>, <canvas> > > and <video> and whitelist in more elements later if necessary. > > <input type=image>? <object>/<embed> seem to have roughly equivalent > use-cases to <video> (though perhaps we just want to encourage > <video>). > > <object> can contain fallback content which might get tricky.
So can <video>. It's a shame to disallow HTML elements with known width and height, e.g. if you want to render a small disconnected <div> subtree into a <canvas> or map it onto a WebGL texture. You'd have to decide how to resolve style (maybe assume it's a child of the body?). Simon
