On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiff...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Ha - I should have waited! ;-) > > But seriously: if you have any other sources of information for what > stats may be useful to people, please add them. > I'm pretty sure that a combination of the mozilla/webkit stats cover all bases. Chris - in the mozilla stats, I agree on the need for a frame count of frames that actually make it the the screen, but am interested in why we need both presented and painted? Wouldn't just a simple 'presented' (i.e. presented to the user) suffice? Cheers! Steve > > And: congrats on the stats released in Chromium & Mozilla! > > Cheers, > Silvia. > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:11 AM, Steve Lacey <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer < > silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Please note that I've started a wiki page at > >> http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Video_Metrics to try and collect all ideas > >> around media element statistics. Please add freely! > > > > Thanks! That was on my todo list for this week. > > Note that the webkit proposal has landed and is available in Chrome 11. > >> > >> Silvia. > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Chris Pearce <ch...@pearce.org.nz> > wrote: > >> > > >> >>>>> Note that the Mozilla implementation I proposed has had a counter > >> >>>>> proposal by another mozilla developer and is being developed > >> >>>>> further. > >> >>>>> See: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580531 > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Thanks. Taking a further look at that. > >> >>>> > >> >>> Reviving thread... > >> >>> > >> >>> I have an initial patch in webkit > >> >>> (http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/77394) > >> >>> and the chromium work is underway - I wonder what might be a good > >> >>> approach > >> >>> to drive the apis closer together towards a real spec that everyone > is > >> >>> happy > >> >>> with? > >> >>> > >> >>> There seems to be a lot of general agreement here (at least in > >> >>> principal > >> >>> :-) that this is needed. We'll be doing a bunch of experimentation > >> >>> once > >> >>> this > >> >>> has landed in chromium. > >> >>> > >> > > >> > I've landed support for some Mozilla-specific video decoding/painting > >> > statistics in Firefox trunk (tracking in Mozilla bug 580531 mentioned > >> > above), it should ship in Firefox 5 in a few months. For a few > details, > >> > see: > >> > > http://blog.pearce.org.nz/2011/03/html5-video-painting-performance.html > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > Chris Pearce. > >> > > > > > >
