On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch> wrote: > The goal of itemref="" was just to have a way to handle cases where you > have an item's properties scattered around a document. > > It's caused us more difficulties than helped anything, as far as I can > tell. Has anyone implemented it or used it and liked it? I'd be fine with > removing it if it's not a lot of trouble... > > I haven't fixed the algorithm to be written more simply, nor fixed the > loops in the JSON stuff, because if we remove itemref="" then those > problems just go away. If we want to keep itemref="", though, I will fix > them. Any opinions one way or the other?
@itemref's necessary for, frex, having an item represented by a table column rather than a row. I believe it should be kept. ~TJ