On 11-08-03 2:55 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:02:58 +0200, Ehsan Akhgari <eh...@mozilla.com>
wrote:
By this definition, it's ambiguous what needs to happen to the
documentElement's undoScope attribute, since it doesn't have an
element ancestor. I think we should just clarify that in that case,
the value is "true", and the undoManager attribute is the same as
document.undoManager.
Maybe those should be merged? That way we do not need to extend Document.
You mean contentEditable and undoScope? That would prohibit the use
case of a web application which is not using contentEditable taking
advantage of UndoManager...
Ehsan
