On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote:
> I still see UndoManager.replace in there. I still haven't heard any use > cases that won't be solved better with a beforeEditingAction event (and > solved ok simply using the undo() function until we have a > beforeEditingAction standardized). > Right. I think we should remove it but I wanted to go talk with a bunch of developers first so they're still pending. Likewise I still haven't heard of any examples where the apply function > isn't simply init+reapply. So it still seems better to me to have a > init/apply/unapply split rather than a apply/reapply/unapply split. > This is also pending for developer feedback. - Ryosuke