>> Riveting tale, chap. Can you provide proof? > >Actually the burden of proof is on those who think that <blockquote> >has >some useful support. No, that's not how burden of proof works. You made a claim regarding blockquote, nils asked for proof. The onus is on you. Thanks, Ash http://ashleysheridan.co.uk
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote element spec vs common qu... Kevin Marks
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote element spec vs comm... Bjartur Thorlacius
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote element spec vs comm... Karl Dubost
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote element spec vs ... Tantek Çelik
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote element spec... Karl Dubost
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote element spec... Jorrit Vermeiren
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote element ... Ian Hickson
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote ele... Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote ele... Nils Dagsson Moskopp
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote ele... Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote ele... Ashley Sheridan
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote ele... Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote ele... Nils Dagsson Moskopp
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote ele... Smylers
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote ele... Ian Hickson
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote ele... Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote ele... Nils Dagsson Moskopp
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote ele... Jukka K. Korpela
- [whatwg] Patterns of well-known... Karl Dubost
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote ele... Ian Hickson
- Re: [whatwg] The blockquote ele... Jukka K. Korpela