On May 14, 2012, at 4:17 PM, Mathew Marquis <m...@matmarquis.com> wrote:
> It’s worth noting that a practical polyfill may not be possible when using > `img set`, for reasons detailed at length elsewhere: > http://www.alistapart.com/articles/responsive-images-how-they-almost-worked-and-what-we-need/ > http://www.netmagazine.com/features/state-responsive-images > > Long story short: attempting to write a polyfill for `img set` leaves us in > the exact situation we were in while trying to solve the issue of responsive > images strictly on the front-end. We would be saddling users with a redundant > download—first for the original src, then for the appropriately-sized source > if needed. Interesting data point. Can you explain why this is the case for the <img srcset> syntax, but not for the <picture> syntax with an embedded <img>? I wasn't able to figure that out, from the articles you linked. Regards, Maciej
