On 11/24/2012 1:34 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > This is super awesome. Glad you continued with this. I have a few > generic points for now: > > * No special handling for IPv4. IPv4 should work the same as domain > names. I.e. the host of http://192/ is 192, not 0.0.0.192. > * It's still a bit unclear to me what the best solution is for > fragment identifiers. Whether they should be percent escaped or not > and whether that should differ between .href and .hash.
There also appears to be some differences in Unicode normalization (assuming I tested this enough), see: http://web.lookout.net/2012/03/unicode-normalization-in-urls.html In my tests: Safari applied NFC normalization to the path, query, and fragment. Chrome applied NFC normalization to the fragment only. MSIE, Firefox, and Opera did not apply normalization anywhere. > * IDNA is a rathole. But it makes for interesting test cases :-) > When are you planning on doing the further cleanup you mention? At > some point I can try to go through them in detail and suggest fixes > (e.g. via a pull request). I plan to do it slowly over the course of the next week or two. - Chris
