On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: >> Why do we want the a) and b) behavior? That's not implemented in the >> gecko implementation of XHR({ anon: true }) (which precedes the spec >> version, so i'm preemptively putting an end to complaints about us not >> following the spec) > > Preceded the specification? I doubt that. When was it added? The > specification was done start of 2010 somewhere based on the > requirements coming from UMP: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010JanMar/0340.html
I see that my attempt at focusing on the important issues failed. Would you like to debate whether the new syntax constitutes a new feature or would you like to debate the technical issues of whether we want the a) and b) behavior? / Jonas