Outlook i suspect (v. pipermail) removed one of my links to the original bug 
posting at w3c: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22022. 
For convenience, view my email with paragraph breaks at http://ow.ly/lyq8H- 
Chris
From: follybeach...@hotmail.com
To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Subject: registerProtocolHandler - allow site to specify more info and do 
custom handling
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 14:30:34 -0400




in case the associated thread of messages for this subject are not referenced 
by pipermail via this post's title, I wanted to link to them 
here-http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-September/023084.html.
I'm writing to discuss/obtain clarification regarding a post that was intended 
to serve as a suggestion from me (which is filed in the w3c system, perhaps 
primarily aimed at identifying bugs) to avoid any loss of momentum and 
hopefully reach the relevant,target audience.
In my w3c suggestion(/bug?) post I described - similar to as voiced in the 
older thread- that there seems to be a limitation that either 
registerProtocolHanlder() takes GET requests but not POST requests or perhaps 
Gmail  ---> as a UA seems to..
To properly route this, I hope you'll help me to understand whether using POST 
in conjunction with mailto:/gmail(-UA) is a w3c concern or a gmail-team 
concern, so I can begin helping shape the web with you!
Thanks for helping,Chris



                                                                                
  

Reply via email to