On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalm...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Yoav Weiss <y...@yoav.ws> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:40 AM, James Graham <ja...@hoppipolla.co.uk> > >> wrote: > >> > This ugliness creates real issues e.g. if I have src-1, src-2 [...] > and I > >> > decide I want a rule that is consulted between src-1 and src-2, I > need to > >> > rewrite all my attribute names. Whilst this might produce a pleasant > >> rush of > >> > nostalgia for children of the 80s brought up on 8-bit Basic, for > everyone > >> > else it seems like an error-prone drag. > >> > >> So all we need to do is to define that you don't have to use a > >> continuous numbered set. I.e. skipping numbers would be allowed. > >> > >> So people can do > >> <img src-10="..." src-20="..."> > >> > >> Then if you need to insert a attribute, you simply do > >> > >> <img src-10="..." src-15="..." src-20="..."> > > > > That is actually already part of the spec (implicitly), for that exact > > reason. > > Well, not for that reason, but it does allow that usage if you want. > My bad. Thought that was the reason you allowed it. > > (I did it because it's an authoring hazard if deleting an attribute > means all src-Ns with higher numbers get ignored.) > > ~TJ >