On 11/22/13 9:41 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
Sure, <option>s are replaced elements either.
You mean aren't?
Except in UAs where they seem to be, right?
For what it's worth, <select> didn't use to be in Gecko either, in this
sense, until we made it so in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591619
I agree that it's vaguer than ideal, and it might be wrong, but it's not
_that_ vague. It says "An element whose content is outside the scope of
the CSS formatting model", and <button>s contents aren't outside the scope
of the CSS formatting model. It seems pretty cut and dry to me.
Is <svg:foreignObject> a replaced element? Why or why not?
Maybe my point is that this definition has little to do with what UAs
are actually doing...
Well, then we should fix CSS.
Imo, yes.
-Boris
