On Dec 3, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Tue, 3 Dec 2013, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: >> On Dec 3, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Adam Barth <aba...@eecs.berkeley.edu> >> wrote: >> >> Do we really need a stack? Can't we set the form element pointer aside >> when we push the first template element and restore it when we pop the >> last template element? > > We could; in fact that might be sufficient because when the template is > cloned, all the special associations are lost anyway, IIRC. So the form > element pointer would be useless anyway in the template on the long run.
Right. I also think that not associating form elements with forms inside/outside template elements might be more natural to authors given their inert nature. - R. Niwa
