When I think over it... Their will be need or demand of more feature, like
light(toLight()), camera(toView()<---- for this one, my than one canvas
property and method would need to be combine... Same for the source, matrix;
rotate, scale, skew, rgba, or globalaphle, etc.) there is no need to creature
new feature from scratch; mixing the feature of the canvas 2D context in 3D
centext, will both show case the 2D ability, and simplified understanding as
when convert from 2D/3D context to WebGL.
Sorry for the grammer mistake, I would be happy to write a draft of this, if
anyone interested in it.
programming. Sorry for the grammar mistakes.
> On Jun 9, 2014, at 12:07 PM, "L2L 2L" <emanuelal...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is it not possible to transfer all canvas' 2D feature into WebGL appearance
> to make a 3D context? Everything the same except that when setting the
> getCentext, you pass 3D instead of 2D. This will make for a more friendly yet
> familiar tool to use. Utilizing WebGL with set features as 2D getContext. I
> believe this proposal is worth looking at and giving thought to; all one
> would have to do is define the API of 2D context in WebGL to have a easy 3D
> context, ensnare if I it's limited, or won't showcase the full capability
> that is WebGL, it'll allow those to take a step toward WebGL by introducing
> it in a familiar API.
>
> var ctx = canvas.getContext("2D");
> Var ctx = canvas.getContext("3D");
>
> By predefining all the feature of 2D context into WebGL to render them in 3D
> context. By doing so, giving a friendly to use, familiar API to work with,
> instead of learning a library.(some of us believe in non library
> programming). Please take interest, or at least thought of mind of this
> ideal... Seeing that the canvas feature are few, I can't see how hard this
> would be for an evangelist to complete in an hour or so.
>
