+1 to either <link rel="script"> much more than <style src="">.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Тимофей Маринин <marinin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Отправлено с iPhone > > > 26 июня 2014 г., в 19:31, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> написал(а): > > > >> On 6/26/14, 10:39 AM, Tim Marinin wrote: > >> If not, then why we need <link> for css, only for legacy reasons? > > > > Pretty much, yes. If <style> were allowed in <head>, we could just do > <style src> (and in fact Gecko had support for that at one point). > > > Do you mean "if style src were supported"? Because otherwise I don't > understand: a lot of sites uses inline styles in head, e.g. Jsfiddle's > iframe.