On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Mathias Bynens <mathi...@opera.com> wrote: > On 26 Jun 2014, at 22:24, Mathias Bynens <mathi...@opera.com> wrote: > >> Interesting to see this would be only the second HTML attribute value to get >> parsed as a simple color >> (http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-microsyntaxes.html#simple-color) >> rather than a legacy color (the other one being `<input type=color >> value=foo>`). > > Actually, the way it’s currently specced it wouldn’t be a parsed as a simple > color value nor as a legacy color value. It should probably be one or the > other (rather than introducing a third, new way to parse color values). > https://github.com/whatwg/meta-brand-color/issues/1
Well, the third way is "as CSS", which already exists in the platform. ~TJ