From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbar...@mit.edu]
> We (Mozilla) support having something here. Great! Thanks for your reply. And sorry for the lack of the specifics. We'll work on nailing something down (spec-wise) as we implement, and of course far ahead of any shipping. I'll reply when I get a repo up. > Not making the error event > even more complicated than it already is makes sense. That's good feedback given the internal split of opinions. Hopefully enough to tip the balance. > Presumably > whatever the new events are would also get propagated from worker global > scope to worker? Agreed. > Event names in the web platform are typically lowercase, not camelCase. For sure. > It's hard to say what "this" you're talking about implementing in Chrome in > terms of the task-queueing behavior. Is that something you just haven't > decided on yet? Yeah, I think this will be something that gets nailed down more during implementation and writing of test cases.
