"Throughout the process, the core developers of SPDY have been involved in the development of HTTP/2, including both Mike Belshe and Roberto Peon. As of February 2015, Google has announced that following the recent final ratification of the HTTP/2 standard, support for SPDY would be deprecated, and that support for SPDY will be withdrawn completely in 2016.[7]" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPDY

Regards

On 03/04/2014 06:37, Tingan Ho wrote:
Hi Ian,

I believe this is being handled by the next-generation transport protocols
(SPDY or whatever it's called now). I recommend approaching the relevant
groups to check that your precise case has been handled.

I just found out that SPDY Server Push and Cookies could accomplish the
above mentioned caching. Cookies will take care of information providing.
And the server just uses Server Push to push content.


On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch> wrote:

On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Tingan Ho wrote:
Almost all web developer I know use externally linked CSS resource in
their web projects. That means that the browser needs to (1) request the
html page (2) parse the html (3) request for the CSS resource that is
linked from the html document. The problem with externally linked
resources is point three. It needs to make another request for the CSS
resource. There is a solution to this problem and that is to inline the
CSS. Though that would yield another problem: all subsequent page
request will become bigger.
I believe this is being handled by the next-generation transport protocols
(SPDY or whatever it's called now). I recommend approaching the relevant
groups to check that your precise case has been handled.

--
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'




--
ldexterldesign ldexterldesign <http://www.ldexterldesign.co.uk/>
Lewis Dexter Litanzios
User Experience Designer
+44 7504 907 304

Reply via email to