+1 on getting a release out sooner rather then later. On 9 jun 2010, at 00.12, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Getting a release out soon sounds like a good idea to me. We'll work out any > incubation release kinks and showing activity (releases) should help with > attracting interest and recruiting contributors. > > I assigned WHIRR-20 to myself, I have some experience with RAT from ZK. I > might take a stab at the website, but before I attempt to do so it would be > good for ppl to review WHIRR-19 and provide feedback. > > Re jclouds, I saw on a recent blog post that they are considering "mock" > provider support. It seems that if we want to get buildbot/hudson setup this > would be very useful. Does anyone know what the status is on that? (jclouds > mock provider). I don't see much about it when searching. > > Regards, > > Patrick > > On 06/08/2010 02:34 PM, Tom White wrote: >> What do folks think needs to be done to do a 0.1.0 release? I had >> originally thought that we should add more services and features, but >> it might be a good idea to do a release fairly soon so people can >> start using Whirr. It would also get any incubator release glitches >> worked out sooner rather than later. Thoughts? >> >> Here's a list of blockers that I've come up with so far: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12311110&priority=1&fixfor=12315111&sorter/field=issuekey >> >> Please feel free to add more. >> >> Cheers, >> Tom
