Feel free to take a look at it. Thanks! Tom
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > Tom were you still planning to do 91? If not lmk and I'll take a stab > at it. I'd like to get an RC built asap. > > Thanks, > > Patrick > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Tom White <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Do you think WHIRR-116 is a blocker too? >> >> I don't think so given the docs are available in the releases >> themselves. Would be nice to have at some point though. >> >> I do notice that it's >> http://incubator.apache.org/whirr/quick-start-guide.html >> rather than say whirr/docs/current/... which would facilitate having >> multiple versions under docs with current being a symbolic link to the >> most recent stable release docs. I'll update the jira. >> >> Patrick >> >>>> >>>> Patrick >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Tom White <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for volunteering to be the release manager! >>>>> >>>>> It would be nice to fix all four, but I agree that only WHIRR-91 is a >>>>> blocker. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Tom >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Hi Folks, do you think it's a good time for a 0.2.0 release? 21 issues >>>>>> fixed so far, 4 open. Only one of those seems like it would be good to >>>>>> fix before 0.2.0 >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-91 >>>>>> >>>>>> In particular updating to the new jclouds and addressing the AMI issue >>>>>> (107) seems worthy of a new release. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd be happy to serve as release manager if everyone else is too busy. >>>>>> :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Patrick >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
