On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
> -1. RAT is failing for me, otherwise things look good (tests and such).
>
> $ mvn apache-rat:check
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.6:check (default-cli) on project
> whirr-cli: Too many unapproved licenses: 1 -> [Help 1]

I just tried running RAT and got the same error, but it is for a whirr
log file (cli/whirr.log), which is produced after running unit tests:
When I remove this file then RAT passes, so it should be OK? We should
probably have RAT ignore log files though.

>
> also I notice that in the shaded cli jar meta-inf/dependencies and
> meta-inf/notice seem to be out of date?

These are generated automatically by the shading process. Which parts
look out of date?

Thanks for looking at the release.

Cheers
Tom

>
> Patrick
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Tom White <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This is the first incubator release for Apache Whirr, version 
>> 0.3.0-incubating.
>>
>> It fixes the following issues:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315487&styleName=Html&projectId=12311110
>>
>> *** Please download, test and vote by January 24 2011.
>>
>> (I know there may be some issues with HBase - I'd be grateful if
>> someone can test the service to see if it works well enough to
>> release.)
>>
>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
>> for convenience.
>>
>> Source and binary files:
>> http://people.apache.org/~tomwhite/whirr-0.3.0-incubating-candidate-0
>>
>> Maven staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewhirr-065
>>
>> The tag to be voted upon:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/whirr/tags/release-0.3.0-incubating
>>
>> Whirr's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/whirr/dist/KEYS
>>
>> Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote upon the release after a
>> successful PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Tom
>>
>

Reply via email to