[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrei Savu updated WHIRR-315:
------------------------------
Attachment: WHIRR-315.patch
I've updated the patch. I was wrong, {{computeService.destroyNode}} works as
expected.
I'm still having one issue with {{NodePredicates.withIds}}. I took a look at
the implementation and it uses {{nodeMetadata.getProviderId()}} which is not
equal to {{nodeMetadata.getId()}}.
Is this the expected behavior? What's the rational?
> Use AWSUtils to handle instance IDs
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: WHIRR-315
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-315
> Project: Whirr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Andrei Savu
> Assignee: Andrei Savu
> Fix For: 0.6.0
>
> Attachments: WHIRR-315.patch, WHIRR-315.patch
>
>
> I realized that I have to use AWSUtills in order to handle instances IDs
> correctly. It looks like inconsistent behavior in jclouds.
> From the documentation I would expect to be able to call:
> {code}
> computeService.destroyNode(metadata.getId())
> {code}
> but I have to do the following call in order to get the expected behavior:
> {code}
> computeService.destroyNode(AWSUtils.parseHandle(metadata.getId())[1]);
> {code}
> Adrian, am I missing something about how jclouds handles instance IDs?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
