OK, I'll go ahead and call a vote on general. As you say, the issues are not real problems, and we've started to address them in WHIRR-319.
Thanks, Tom On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think it's strictly necessary, given that the issues identified are > invalid. On the plus side it would eliminate the possibility of confusion > (i.e. other IPMC members testing out the release and finding that the build > fails). > > Up to you. Update my vote to +0 rather than prior -1. > > Patrick > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Tom White <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Patrick, >> >> I've created a patch to fix the issues you found in WHIRR-319. Do you >> think I should roll a new candidate with these changes? >> >> Thanks, >> Tom >> >> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hm, actually the two items it found are bogus: >> > >> > Unapproved licenses: >> > src/site/confluence/whirr-in-5-minutes.confluence.rej >> > src/site/resources/images/whirr-logo.ai >> > >> > but still, something is wrong that this wasn't flagged earlier in the >> process. >> > >> > Patrick >> > >> > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> -1 >> >> >> >> In general things look good (signature valid, tests pass), however RAT >> >> is failing: >> >> >> >> from the rc1 source archive file: >> >> whirr-0.5.0-incubating$ mvn apache-rat:check >> >> ... >> >> [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE >> >> [INFO] >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> [INFO] Too many unapproved licenses: 2 >> >> .... >> >> >> >> any idea why RAT isn't running as part of the std build, or at least >> >> as part of the release process? >> >> >> >> >> >> I also notice that the two RC archives are unarchiving to the same >> >> directory. Shouldn't the -src archive unarchive to a -src directory? >> >> It would be confusing otherwise. >> >> >> >> Patrick >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Andrei Savu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >> >>> >> >>> * checked signatures and hashes for both archives >> >>> * unit tests pass on source release and SVN tag >> >>> * integration tests pass on aws-ec2 and cloudservers-us >> >>> * started a HBase cluster and executed the ycsb_quick_test.sh script >> >>> >> >>> Cheers, >> >>> >> >>> -- Andrei Savu >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Tom White <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>> Please vote on this second incubator release candidate for Apache >> Whirr, >> >>>> version 0.5.0-incubating. >> >>>> >> >>>> It fixes the following issues: >> >>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12316248&styleName=Html&projectId=12311110 >> >>>> >> >>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided >> >>>> for convenience. >> >>>> >> >>>> Source and binary files: >> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~tomwhite/whirr-0.5.0-incubating-candidate-1 >> >>>> >> >>>> Maven staging repo: >> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewhirr-012 >> >>>> >> >>>> The tag to be voted upon: >> >>>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/whirr/tags/release-0.5.0-incubating >> >>>> >> >>>> Whirr's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: >> >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/whirr/dist/KEYS >> >>>> >> >>>> The vote is open for 72 hours. >> >>>> >> >>>> Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote upon the release after a >> >>>> successful PPMC vote before any release can be made official. >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks, >> >>>> Tom >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >
