Hi David, I would say that it's definitely worth attaching to the JIRA so others can look at it.
Thanks, Tom On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:05 AM, David Alves <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All > > I implemented a chef service. > The service itself installs ruby and chef-solo and it provides easy to > use classes to run recipes on the cluster that could be used by other > services. > > I still has some limitations as I only tested in rackspace, the > implementation for RHEL based distros is still partly missing, and it only > accepts cookbooks by url (does not fetch them from the central repo yet). > Nonetheless it might be interesting to someone else. > > My question is: > - I got a sense from the puppet issue that another direction was > decided in terms of provisioning (e.g., not making chef or puppet common > services but part of a provisioning abstraction). Did I misunderstand? is it > still worth attaching the patch to the chef issue? > > Cheers > David Alves >
