With V2 there are overall 4 failing tests as well, which are failing
for other reasons. 3 are related to wicket:component and one is called
ScopedHeader.... Ignore these errors for now. Does maven show the same
errors or different one?

Juergen

On 10/15/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That bug is fixed now too. What remains is that from eclipse all tests
run fine, but from maven, several fail (2 failures, 4 errors).

Eelco


On 10/15/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The loop is fixed. What - again - drives me crazy though is that these
> tests work fine in Eclipse but fail with maven.
>
> Eelco
>
>
> On 10/15/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Fixed.
> >
> > On 10/15/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Great. Indeed, with maven there is a loop.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/15/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > For the record, I didn't really change the initializer code, but for
> > > > 1.2 I added a project, wicket-jmx, which has a wicket.properties file
> > > > and an initializer, and for 2.0 I added the jmx code in the core
> > > > project itself, and added that initializer call to the already
> > > > existing inititializer. I can see from the stacktrace that you've been
> > > > testing 2.0. It should be perfectly legal to add an initializer like
> > > > that though, and we've done that before without troubles too.
> > > >
> > > > Eelco
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 10/15/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Interesting... I don't get such exceptions, nor do I get that loop. I
> > > > > test from Eclipse. You?
> > > > >
> > > > > Eelco
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/15/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Once I fixed the endless loop I got
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wicket.WicketRuntimeException:
> > > > > > javax.management.InstanceAlreadyExistsException:
> > > > > > wicket.app.WicketTester:type=Application,name=ApplicationSettings
> > > > > >         at wicket.jmx.Initializer.init(Initializer.java:97)
> > > > > >         at wicket.Initializer.init(Initializer.java:51)
> > > > > >         at wicket.Application.initialize(Application.java:808)
> > > > > >         at 
wicket.Application.initializeComponents(Application.java:831)
> > > > > >         at 
wicket.Application.initializeComponents(Application.java:577)
> > > > > >         at 
wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.init(WicketFilter.java:344)
> > > > > >         at 
wicket.protocol.http.MockWebApplication.<init>(MockWebApplication.java:148)
> > > > > >         at 
wicket.util.tester.WicketTester.<init>(WicketTester.java:205)
> > > > > >         at wicket.WicketTestCase.setUp(WicketTestCase.java:62)
> > > > > >         at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:125)
> > > > > >         at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)
> > > > > >         at 
junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)
> > > > > >         at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
> > > > > >         at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)
> > > > > >         at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
> > > > > >         at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
> > > > > >         at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.junit3.JUnit3TestReference.run(JUnit3TestReference.java:128)
> > > > > >         at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
> > > > > >         at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:460)
> > > > > >         at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:673)
> > > > > >         at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:386)
> > > > > >         at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:196)
> > > > > > Caused by: javax.management.InstanceAlreadyExistsException:
> > > > > > wicket.app.WicketTester:type=Application,name=ApplicationSettings
> > > > > >         at 
com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.RepositorySupport.addMBean(RepositorySupport.java:452)
> > > > > >         at 
com.sun.jmx.interceptor.DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.internal_addObject(DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.java:1410)
> > > > > >         at 
com.sun.jmx.interceptor.DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.registerObject(DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.java:936)
> > > > > >         at 
com.sun.jmx.interceptor.DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.registerMBean(DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.java:337)
> > > > > >         at 
com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.JmxMBeanServer.registerMBean(JmxMBeanServer.java:497)
> > > > > >         at wicket.jmx.Initializer.init(Initializer.java:68)
> > > > > >         ... 21 more
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 10/15/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Did someone recently change the initializer code? It seems like 
it is
> > > > > > > causing endless loops with the junit tests
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Juergen
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to