I was going to propose to use checkstyle instead. Problem with checkstyle is that it is not a unit test and doesn't run inside Eclipse, NetBeans or IDEA :-).
I would also (as a preliminary action) add javascript to the list (.js). We can always remove them, but at the moment, they need to be in there. I don't expect ASF to relax their stance on those files. +1 on removing the svn keywords. Martijn On 11/5/06, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Last night when I couldn't sleep I got this crazy idea to write a unittest for checking the source files in the project for correct license headers. When I woke up this morning the idea still seemed quite reasonable, so I cleaned it up and have now committed some code for it[1]. So what does this mean? Well to begin with the test checks the following file types: .java, .xml, .html, .properties, .fml, .css and .vm. For .java files it's checking on the new updated Apache2 license header[2], *without* our svn keywords. The developers I have talked to doesn't seem to care about those anyway, but WDYT? The test doesn't fix the headers or add the license. WDYT? Frank [1]: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=471390 [2]: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
-- <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket";>Vote</a> for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket";>Wicket</a> at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best Stuff in the World!</a>
