I've seen the fix and I don't understand why. Please correct me if I'm
wrong but you just replaced DummyApplication.java with an inline
DummyWebApplication. What was the reason for the change?

Juergen

On 11/7/06, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Juergen I really don't hope you are working on it, because I have just
committed the fix :S

Frank

On 11/7/06, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Right now WicketTester (src/main) uses DummyApplication (src/test).
> Juergen are you looking at that or should I.
>
> Frank
>
> On 11/6/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > just making sure you knew about it to save you some work :)
> >
> > -igor
> >
> > On 11/6/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I didn't like the patch. It only merged MockWebApplication and
> > > WebTester into a single big class. The author assumed it works, but as
> > > the patch didn't include the modification necessary to the existing
> > > junit test cases, ...
> > >
> > > Juergen
> > >
> > > On 11/6/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > didnt someone already submit a patch that does this?
> > > >
> > > > -igor
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 11/6/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Currently MockWebApplication and WicketTester are derived from
> > > > > WebApplication which requires us to copy & paste code from
> > > > > MyApplication to MyWicketTester which is kind of ugly. I changed
> > > > > MockWebApplication to delegate to an application instead. It seems
> to
> > > > > work fine but most xxxExpectedResult.html files must be changed.
> > > > > Example
> > > > >
> > > > > <a
> > > > >
> > >
> href="/WicketTester/WicketTester?wicket:interface=:0:link::ILinkListener"
> > > > > wicket:id="link">test</a>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > <a
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> 
href="/DummyApplication/DummyApplication?wicket:interface=:0:link::ILinkListener"
> > > > > wicket:id="link">test</a>
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess that is ok, but I want to check with you first. Any
> thought?
> > > > >
> > > > > Juergen
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to