What do you think i have been doing the past weekend!! :)
This is really as fast and as small as we can get. Its almost no overhead and we only store as less bytes as possible. Its really almost done (for a few bugs of course) The only thing that is open now is that new GregorianCalendar() doesn't work quite right And i should improve the primitive arrays. Those are done wrong at the moment. johan On 2/12/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
well the fact that it is LGPL is ok, we can rewrite the pieces we need. i was mainly interested in the ideas they used, they did claim it was 30% faster? hmm.... -igor On 2/12/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/12/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/12/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > before we start doing all this have you guys tried the jboss > serialization > > > thing yet? > > > > Yes, and it didn't even remotely work for the project I'm working on. > > Furthermore, maybe I'm wrong, but it seems that after doing two > > initial releases this project got forgotten/ abandoned whatever. It > > also is LGPL licensed. > > Also, if I remember correctly, Johan said he did get it to work, but > experienced that it was actually slower than normal JDK serialization. > > Eelco >
