really? i if see how long yourkit needs to compute sometimes to get everything.. then i am curious why it can be soo much faster, but i guess it is easier when on live data with the jvm helping.
johan On 2/13/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yes. that's my understanding. actual memory consumed by entire graph. Johan Compagner wrote: > > But gives it the Deep clone size? > If it doesn't it is useless > > johan > > > On 2/13/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> I think now that we're dependent on JDK 1.5+, there is a JMX-related >> sizeof >> method we can use to find out the exact size of a given object in memory. >> We might want to switch to that. >> >> >> Eelco Hillenius wrote: >> > >> > On 2/12/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Thats fine. >> >> Already thought about it where we let the Objects class look at a >> setting >> >> where >> >> you can choose what every you want. >> >> But i don't think that is really a choice many people will use. But if >> >> they >> >> can come up with a better way for serialization and deserialization >> thats >> >> fine with me >> > >> > I just want to make sure we have a fallback for people to use in case >> > we have some unforseen bug in our mechanism or their security >> > environment doesn't allow for some of the things we do or they have >> > some other reason to prefer another (i.e. Java's default) >> > serialization mechanism. >> > >> >> We just have to make sure that those 2 methods are called always when >> we >> >> do >> >> the clone or save... >> >> For example the sizeOf methods should also be altered! >> > >> > I wouldn't have a problem with sizeOf depending on it more directly if >> > there isn't a practical way around it (though I'm sure there is); >> > that's merely a utility whereas serialization for versions is a >> > central piece of the framework. >> > >> > Eelco >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/custom-serialization-seems-to-work...-tf3210889.html#a8938197 >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/custom-serialization-seems-to-work...-tf3210889.html#a8945820 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
