What would be the correct naming that the api is stable?
API not stable: Alpha API stable: Beta Release 'stable' : RC ? johan On 5/22/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/22/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i think releasing one extra beta is fine. > But most api is now stable i think so if stable api was the deciding factor > if something is called beta or rc... From my point of view, a release candidate is a distribution you plan to graduate to the release status if no major bug is discovered. If you already know you will still fix some bugs before the final release, it shouldn't be named a release candidate. My 2c. Xavier > > johan > > > > On 5/22/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Looking at JIRA and some troubles we have on the lists, we won't be > > able to pull 1.3 rc1 any time soon. > > > > I therefore propose the folowing schema for the coming weeks: > > - release 1.3.0-incubating-beta2 > > - graduate + transfer to TLP > > - release 1.3.0-rc1 > > - release 1.3.0-rc2 > > - rename to 1.3.0 > > > > WDYT? > > > > Martijn > > > > -- > > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com > > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket > > Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now! > > http://wicketframework.org > > > -- Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant Manage your dependencies with Ivy! http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/
