Ok. Maurice
On 6/17/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is exactly what i am doing right now. And i have no problem if it > has to stay that way. However I thought i might be helpful for > everyone extending CompoundPropertyModel, and given the fact that none > of the methods in AttachedCompoundPropertyModel are final or otherwise > protected against overriding i though it was an oversight. And like > you said there is not much going on in that class so why not make it > extendable. Well, exactly because there isn't much going on in that class: why make expose it? It will only increase the API surface and limits our future options for refactoring the things internally. Eelco
