I found this one on the Apache site [1]:
If A Distribution Contains Code Under Several Licenses, Should It
Contain Several License Files?
No - all license information should be contained in the LICENSE file.
When a distribution contains code under several licenses, the LICENSE
file should contain details of all these licenses. For each component
which is not Apache licensed, details of the component and the license
under which the component is distributed should be appended to the
LICENSE file.
I guess I have to perform some additional license scripting foo.
Martijn
[1]
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses
On 6/26/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ ] I checked the distribution, and I +1 the release of them
[ ] I didn't check the distribution, but I want to release them regardless (+0)
[x] I don't want to release the distribution, because wicket-ioc
and wicket-guice are not in the "lib" directory, which may prevent
wicket-spring from working if someone takes it from there.
However the wicket examples war *has* those dependencies so
it's not a major issue.
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
--
Wicket joins the Apache Software Foundation as Apache Wicket
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org
