+1 Juergen
On 7/1/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
fine by me +1 On 6/30/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Igor just committed a maven archetype to our svn and we still have a > quickstart and examples project that seem a bit out of place for our > main distribution. > > trunk/ > archetypes/ > jdk-1.4/ > wicket-quickstart > jdk-1.5/ > wicket-examples/ > testing/ > README > NOTICE > LICENSE > release.sh > eclipse.sh > pom.xml > > I'm proposing to move things a bit around. > > trunk/ > applications/ > wicket-archetype/ > wicket-quickstart/ > wicket-examples/ > jdk-1.4/ > jdk-1.5/ > testing/ > README > NOTICE > LICENSE > release.sh > eclipse.sh > pom.xml > > > Each application will then have a separate release distribution, so we > will release: > > wicket-1.3.zip > wicket-quickstart-1.3.zip > wicket-examples-1.3.zip > (the archetype will only be released through the maven repo) > > The wicket zip will contain all library projects, so no stand alone war > apps. > > The benefit is that we don't need to ship all those licenses in our > main distribution, but can limit that to the wicket-examples > distribution. I found it very hard to see and follow what we ship and > what we don't. The examples distribution is the biggest project with > all dependencies coming together. > > WDYT? > > Martijn > > -- > Wicket joins the Apache Software Foundation as Apache Wicket > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket > Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now! > http://wicketframework.org >
