I built a page store using ehcache but it didn't really give any benefit, was actually slower that what we have now.
-Matej On 7/16/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
secondlevelcache doesn't cache anything anymore. (except caching it on disk) So ehcache cant really be used there. johan On 7/15/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ehcache seems to be Apache licensed, so there is no immediate reason > to put it into wicketstuff. > > Given that the extensions project is used to mature components and > features, I think it is a logical place for it to be in. > > But given the limited usage: it is only used for the markup cache, > correct? Woould the second level cache be a second feature that could > benefit from ehcache? > > Martijn > > On 7/15/07, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > no big plus, just playing a bit and having the option if some realy > > realy needs it.It should not go into the core project for sure. I'm > > just looking for the right place to drop it. If extension is not the > > right place either, due to the dependency, where should go? If not > > useful at all, we don't need to put it anywhere. > > > > Juergen > > > > On 7/15/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > hmm i dont see the big plus, why would you have eviction? (except when > the > > > file really changes) > > > The only eviction strategy i see that would be usefull is based if the > > > avaialable memory is used up > > > and it should free something. > > > > > > johan > > > > > > > > > On 7/15/07, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > You can have all the out-the-box stats, jmx, eviction (remove if > > > > markup was not requested for >7 days) etc. > > > > > > > > Juergen > > > > > > > > On 7/15/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 7/14/07, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I've created a ehcache based MarkupCache extension. On my laptop > it is > > > > > > currently in wicket-extension which due to ehcache requires a > ehcache > > > > > > dependency in pom.xml. I wonder whether wicket-extension realy > is the > > > > > > right place? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what are the advantages of this over the one we have? > > > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Juergen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Wicket joins the Apache Software Foundation as Apache Wicket > Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta2 is released > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta2/ >
