Hmmm... dunno. Is it really worth the effort? It will make it generally
harder for people to build the project, as not everyone will have JDK1.5
installed.
You want this in 1.0?
Eelco
Jonathan Locke wrote:
if we are all nice and backwards compatible in a binary sense, it
might be nice to use generics in some places. in particular the
listenerset class i'm working on would be better implemented that way.
what do we think about generifying code and requiring 1.5 to build the
core?
jon
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
