Ah, I get it now :) Thanks.
Gili
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 00:11:04 +0100, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>Nah, XUL *needs* it. Wicket doesn't properly parse it.
>
>e.g. <html:form will result in a ComponentTag with tagName 'html'. The
>FormComponent checks whether the tag name == 'form', which thus fails.
>
>Eelco
>
>Gili wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I don't get it. I get that XUL doesn't handle namespaces
>>properly but I don't understand the proposed workaround. What is this
>>about a namespace property for ComponentTag?
>>
>>Gili
>>
>>On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:40:31 +0100, Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
>>
>>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
>Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
>It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
>_______________________________________________
>Wicket-develop mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
